Finfluencers, Regulatory Gaps, and €7.9 Billion in Annual Consumer Harm: What the Finance Watch Report Found
This is the second of two articles covering the Finance Watch report on dark patterns, addictive design, and misleading influencer marketing in EU financial services. Part 1 covered the regulatory gaps around dark patterns and addictive design features. This part covers finfluencers and the aggregate financial harm estimate.
What finfluencers are and what they do
The report defines finfluencers as content creators on social media who promote financial products or claim to provide financial education. The distinction between those two activities is at the centre of the regulatory problem.
According to the report, 54% of finfluencer content analysed was presented as purely educational rather than advertising. In practice, most finfluencers are paid by financial institutions and have no professional qualifications. Whether content is framed as education or promotion determines which regulations apply, and according to the report, that framing is frequently used to avoid the latter category.
The private dimension of finfluencer activity compounds the problem. Paid communities on Discord, Patreon, and online course platforms are not publicly observable and fall outside regulatory frameworks that depend on public visibility to trigger disclosure requirements.
The targeting of minors
The report identifies the targeting of minors as a particular concern. TikTok, where approximately 14% of users are aged 13 to 17 and around 30% are aged 18 to 24, is one of the primary platforms through which finfluencer content reaches young audiences. The report found examples of content specifically encouraging underage investing through parent accounts, with minors directly exposed to financial promotion content framed as education.
The regulatory gaps
The report maps the existing frameworks against the finfluencer problem and finds several significant gaps.
The Audiovisual Media Services Directive requires platforms to provide tools for disclosing commercial content, but does not specify when or how those tools should be applied and does not protect minors from financial promotions specifically.
The Unfair Commercial Practices Directive could in principle apply to finfluencers as traders, but there is no binding guidance and no Court of Justice of the European Union case law establishing how the directive applies to this context.
The Retail Investment Strategy, updated in June 2026, covers paid promotions where there is a clear and formal commercial relationship between the influencer and the financial institution. It excludes crypto assets entirely. Independent influencers with no formal commercial ties fall outside the framework altogether, as does content framed as financial education rather than direct product promotion.
No licensing or registration requirements exist for finfluencers anywhere in the EU regulatory framework. The report identifies this as a fundamental gap: the absence of any entry requirement means there is no baseline standard of competence or disclosure obligation that applies before a finfluencer begins operating.
The scale of harm
The report quantifies the aggregate financial harm from unfair commercial practices online across the EU at €7.9 billion per year. The report describes this as a conservative estimate of post-redress consumer detriment, meaning it accounts only for harm that persisted after any available remedies had been applied. The highest levels of detriment were found among younger age groups.
In France, a consumer collective filed complaints against approximately 100 influencers in January 2023 for promoting risky financial markets with false promises of gains. In the Netherlands, the Dutch Financial Supervisory Authority received dozens of complaints from consumers who lost substantial amounts of money following influencer recommendations, with some reporting the loss of their entire savings.
EU households held €5,610 billion, representing 38.6% of GDP, in financial securities as of 2021. The report notes that this figure is expected to increase as EU policy encourages greater retail investment participation, which makes the question of how retail investors receive information and advice increasingly consequential.
Fairpatterns detects dark patterns and addictive design features automatically, across platforms and sectors, including financial services.
Trusted by clients worldwide
Jolling de Pree
Partner at De Brauw
Name Surname
Position, Company name
